The Complete Guide to Rigid-Flex PCB Assembly: Design, Process, and Applications

In the world of advanced electronics—from aerospace avionics to compact medical wearables—Rigid-Flex PCB Assembly represents the pinnacle of interconnect technology. It is not merely about connecting components; it is about creating a 3D interconnect system that saves space, reduces weight, and improves mechanical reliability by eliminating connectors.

However, assembling a Rigid-Flex board is significantly more complex than the standard process. It introduces unique challenges regarding moisture control, thermal management, and mechanical fixturing.

At NextPCB, we specialize in high-reliability PCB assembly services, bridging the gap between complex designs and mass production. This guide provides a deep dive into the Rigid-Flex assembly process, offering actionable DFM (Design for Manufacturing) insights for engineers and procurement managers.

1. Table of Content
2. 1. Understanding the Hybrid Architecture
3. 2. The Unique Challenges of Rigid-Flex Assembly
4. 3. The Rigid-Flex Assembly Workflow
5. 4. DFM Guidelines for Engineers: Reducing Assembly Risk
6. 5. Cost vs. Reliability: A Procurement Perspective
7. 6. Why NextPCB Excels in Rigid-Flex Assembly
8. Rigid-Flex PCB Assembly — Frequently Asked Questions

1. Understanding the Hybrid Architecture

Before diving into the assembly line, it is crucial to understand the substrate you are working with. A Rigid-Flex PCB integrates rigid circuit board elements (typically FR-4) with flexible circuits (Polyimide) into a single, permanently bonded unit.

Decision Tip: Are you unsure if you truly need a complex Rigid-Flex structure, or if a standard Rigid board with discrete flex cables would suffice? Read our comprehensive comparison: Flex vs. Rigid vs. Rigid-Flex PCB: Making the Right Choice.

If you have determined that Rigid-Flex is the right solution for your 3D packaging needs, the focus now shifts to manufacturability.

2. The Unique Challenges of Rigid-Flex Assembly

Compared to the standard rigid PCB assembly process, the rigid-flex process introduces variables that, if uncontrolled, can lead to catastrophic failure.

A. The Moisture Menace: Preventing Delamination

Polyimide (PI), the core material of the flexible section, is highly hygroscopic. It absorbs moisture from the air much faster than FR-4—up to 3% by weight. During the high temperatures of reflow soldering (240°C - 260°C), trapped moisture turns into steam, expanding rapidly and causing delamination (layer separation) or "popcorning."

• The NextPCB Solution: We reference IPC industry standards for moisture management and develop specific pre-baking protocols based on board thickness and material properties. This typically involves baking boards at controlled temperatures (e.g., 100°C–120°C) for several hours immediately before assembly to ensure the substrate is completely dry.

B. Planarity and Fixturing

Flexible zones make the board unstable. Standard SMT conveyors cannot handle a floppy board.

• The Solution: We utilize appropriate mechanical support mechanisms or specialized fixtures to secure the flexible regions. These fixtures ensure planarity and co-planarity with the rigid sections during solder paste printing and component placement, allowing for precise alignment between the stencil and the pads.

3. The Rigid-Flex Assembly Workflow

While the logic is similar to general assembly—which you can explore in our comprehensive guide to PCB assembly—the specific steps for Rigid-Flex differ significantly to accommodate material properties.

Step 1: Design for Assembly (DFA) Review

Our CAM engineers review the "Transition Zone" (where rigid meets flex). Vias placed too close to the transition line are a major failure point.

• Pro Tip: Before submitting your files, use NextPCB's free online Gerber viewer to visually inspect your stack-up and drill locations, ensuring no holes accidentally penetrate the flex transition area.

Step 2: Baking (Dehumidification)

As mentioned, this is a critical step for material stability. The baking time is calculated to ensure the PI material is sufficiently dry before hitting the reflow oven, reducing the risk of internal stress or layer separation.

Step 3: Solder Paste Printing & SMT

The board is mounted on a supportive carrier. We utilize Surface Mount Technology (SMT) to place components.

Note: For optimal assembly reliability, we recommend prioritizing the placement of high-density or complex components (such as fine-pitch BGAs) on the rigid sections. If components must be placed on the flexible areas, they should be supported by a proper stiffener design to prevent mechanical stress on the solder joints.

Step 4: Reflow Soldering

Because Polyimide transfers heat differently than FR-4, the thermal ramp-up must be carefully controlled to prevent thermal shock to the adhesive layers. We use specialized reflow profiles with a slower soak zone to ensure even heating across both rigid and flex materials.

Step 5: Depaneling (The Critical Step)

Unlike rigid boards that can be V-cut (scored), rigid-flex boards require more precise methods. We recommend low-stress depaneling techniques, such as precision routing or laser cutting, to minimize the risk of damage to the flexible coverlay and the sensitive transition zones.

4. DFM Guidelines for Engineers: Reducing Assembly Risk

To ensure your Rigid-Flex design sails through production, conducting a thorough DFM (Design for Manufacturability) review is essential. Consider these critical design rules:

4.1 Stiffener Placement

If you are placing components on a flexible arm, you must utilize a stiffener (FR-4, PI, or Stainless Steel) on the opposite side. Without a stiffener, the solder joints will crack when the flex bends.

• Guideline: The stiffener should extend 0.5mm to 1.0mm beyond the component footprint to relieve stress on the solder joints.

4.2 The Transition Zone

Never place plated through-holes (PTH) or vias strictly within the bend line or the transition zone.

• Rule of Thumb: Keep vias at least 50 mils (1.27mm) away from the rigid-to-flex transition interface to prevents barrel cracks during thermal expansion.

4.3 Trace Routing in Flex Areas

To maximize dynamic flex life (according to IPC-2223):

• Use curved traces instead of 45° or 90° angles in flex zones to reduce stress concentration.
• Distribute traces evenly and stagger them layer-to-layer (I-beam effect avoidance).
• Use "hatched" copper planes for ground layers in the flex area to maintain flexibility compared to solid copper pours.

4.4 Panelization for Assembly

Do not ship rigid-flex boards as loose pieces. Supply them in a panel array.

• Requirement: Ensure the waste tabs connect the rigid sections, not the flex sections, to provide stability during the SMT process.

5. Cost vs. Reliability: A Procurement Perspective

We often hear from procurement managers: "Why is Rigid-Flex assembly more expensive?"

The cost is driven by:

1. Material Cost: Rolled Annealed Copper (RA) and high-grade Polyimide are more expensive than standard Electro-Deposited (ED) copper and FR-4.
2. Manual Labor: Handling requires careful preparation, alignment within fixtures, and meticulous inspection.
3. Yield Risk: The manufacturing process involves up to 2x the steps of a rigid board.

However, the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is often lower. By using Rigid-Flex, you eliminate:

• The cost of wire harnesses and ZIF connectors.
• The manual labor of assembling cables.
• The cost of returns due to cable failures (vibration testing often favors Rigid-Flex).

6. Why NextPCB Excels in Rigid-Flex Assembly

Rigid-Flex assembly is not just about having SMT machines; it is about process discipline. At NextPCB, we combine over 15 years of manufacturing data with advanced assembly protocols.

• Custom Engineering Support: NextPCB has a professional engineering team capable of customizing assembly support solutions and tooling for diverse product geometries.
• Strict QC: We perform Automated Optical Inspection (AOI) and X-Ray inspection (for BGAs) on all rigid-flex assemblies. We also offer Flying Probe Testing to verify continuity across the flex-to-rigid transition.
• IPC Compliance: Whether for consumer electronics or industrial control, we manufacture and assemble to high reliability standards, ensuring your designs perform under real-world conditions.

Rigid‑Flex PCB Assembly — Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Why do rigid‑flex PCBs often fail electrical continuity after assembly or show high resistance/open circuits?

Answer: Rigid‑flex boards combine rigid and flexible sections, and design or material issues can lead to trace stress, conductor fractures, or delamination in flex zones. When the flex regions aren’t designed with adequate bend relief or correct stack‑up (e.g., improper dielectric or adhesive selection), copper traces can stress and crack, leading to intermittent or open circuits after assembly or thermal cycling.

Q2. What specific design challenges cause rigid‑flex assemblies to fail mechanically (e.g., bends, cracks, or stress at rigid‑flex interfaces)?

Answer: Rigid‑flex PCBs require special attention to bend radius, material selection, and layer transitions. Inappropriate bend radius or placing vias too close to flex/rigid boundaries increases mechanical stress during assembly or use, leading to fractures or delamination under repeated bending or vibration.

Q3. Why do rigid‑flex PCB designs often cost much more and have longer prototype lead times than standard rigid PCBs?

Answer: Rigid‑flex boards use complex laminate materials, multi‑stage lamination processes, controlled stack‑ups, and precise drilling/plating across rigid and flex regions. These specialized processes require more time, careful DFM/DFT planning, and skilled engineering support to avoid manufacturing defects.

Q4. How do component placement and bending design affect rigid‑flex PCB assembly reliability?

Answer: Placing components too close to a bend or flex section can cause solder joint cracking or pad delamination when the PCB bends or undergoes thermal stress. Proper placement away from flexing areas and the use of stiffeners to reinforce components are key to prevent assembly failures.

Q5. What are the most common DFM (Design for Manufacturability) mistakes that lead to rigid‑flex PCB assembly problems?

Answer: Rigid‑flex design introduces unique DFM constraints compared to rigid PCBs. Common missteps include: placing vias too close to flex boundaries, incorrect material choice, insufficient conductor spacing, failure to honor minimum bend radius, overlapping traces in bend zones, and inadequate drill‑to‑copper spacing.

Ready to Prototype?

Rigid-Flex technology is the future of compact, high-performance electronics. Don't let assembly challenges hold your design back.

Request a Free Quote Today and let our engineering team review your Gerber files for optimal manufacturability.

About the Author

Arya Li, Project Manager at NextPCB.com

With extensive experience in manufacturing and international client management, Arya has guided factory visits for over 200 overseas clients, providing bilingual (English & Chinese) presentations on production processes, quality control systems, and advanced manufacturing capabilities. Her deep understanding of both the factory side and client requirements allows her to deliver professional, reliable PCB solutions efficiently. Detail-oriented and service-driven, Arya is committed to being a trusted partner for clients and showcasing the strength and expertise of the factory in the global PCB and PCBA market.

LinkedIn