Support Team
Feedback:
support@nextpcb.comYou've been through the cycle before. You uploaded your Gerbers, confirmed the specs, paid, and waited. The boards arrived — and something is wrong. Maybe the copper thickness is off. Maybe there's solder mask misalignment on a fine-pitch BGA. Maybe the impedance is out of spec and your high-speed signals are failing.
What happens next is where PCB manufacturers truly separate themselves.
No manufacturing process is perfect. What defines a reliable partner isn't whether problems ever occur — it's how those problems are handled when they do.
Based on recurring feedback from hardware engineers, the most frequent post-delivery issues fall into a few consistent categories:
Quality defects on bare boards: copper thickness outside specified tolerance, solder mask misalignment on fine-pitch pads, drill position deviation on blind/buried vias in HDI boards, incomplete hole plating leading to open circuits.
Assembly issues on PCBA orders: cold solder joints on BGA packages, missing or incorrectly placed components, assembly defects that weren't caught before shipment.
Documentation gaps: missing inspection records, traceability gaps for regulated applications, test reports that don't match what was ordered.
Any of these can halt your project or delay a launch by weeks. The question isn't whether they'll ever happen — it's whether your manufacturer has a process to deal with them when they do.
The pattern is consistent enough that most engineers have experienced it at least once:
Slow, scripted responses. You file a complaint and get a reply asking for photos. You send them. Another day passes. Another request comes in. The process stretches into weeks with no resolution path in sight.
Responsibility deflection. Instead of acknowledging a manufacturing defect, the response suggests your Gerber files may have been incorrect — even when your design files passed DRC cleanly and you have the DFM report to prove it.
No way to escalate. Every message goes back to the same contact. There's no independent review, no one with authority to make a decision, and no way to know whether anyone else is even looking at your case.
Remedies disconnected from the actual damage. You receive a small discount on a future order in exchange for boards that cost you three weeks of your schedule. The gap between what's offered and what you actually lost is significant.
Here is a framework for evaluating any PCB manufacturer's post-delivery process before you commit to them.
A manufacturer that takes quality seriously should acknowledge your complaint promptly and provide a timeline for diagnosis. Vague responses like "we'll look into it" with no timeframe are a warning sign.
Quality disputes should involve people with engineering knowledge, not only customer-facing account staff. The ability to review production records, inspection logs, and process data is what makes a quality determination credible — not just a judgment call by someone managing your account.
If a manufacturer performs DFM review before production, the scope of their responsibility becomes clearer: design-related issues should ideally be caught before boards are made. When defects reach you after delivery, they are more likely to be manufacturing issues — and a manufacturer who uses DFM seriously will treat them accordingly.
The best way to handle assembly defects is to catch them before boards leave the factory. Manufacturers who offer pre-shipment functional testing give you a layer of protection that no after-sales process can fully replace.
At NextPCB, quality complaints are handled by a dedicated after-sales quality team that operates independently from the sales team responsible for your order. This team is involved in every quality case, even though your primary communication channel remains your account contact.
Our target is to respond to quality inquiries within one working day. For complex cases involving manufacturing defects, our QA team reviews production and inspection records to assess responsibility before proposing a resolution.
DFM review verifies manufacturability before production starts. Our DFM process, powered by HQDFM, checks every order against NextPCB's manufacturing capabilities before production begins. If your files contain features outside our production parameters — drill sizes, trace widths, clearances, or stackup specifications that fall outside our stated capabilities — we will flag these and contact you before proceeding. What DFM cannot do is evaluate your design intent: whether the circuit is correct, whether component choices are appropriate, or whether the design will perform as expected in your application. Our responsibility is to manufacture your boards accurately to your files. If a defect after delivery is traced to our manufacturing process deviating from your specifications, we treat that as our responsibility.
For PCBA orders using our component sourcing service, we maintain traceability records for every component lot.
Free functional testing is available upon request. For assembled boards, we can perform functional testing before shipment. This catches assembly issues before they become post-delivery problems — which is far better for your schedule than finding out after the boards arrive.
We hold our products to IPC-A-600J Class 2 as a minimum standard, with Class 3 available for applications that require it, and our manufacturing processes are certified to ISO 9001 and UL standards.
> NextPCB Promise the Product Safety with ISO 9001 UL Certifications
The answers — and how clearly they're given — tell you more about a manufacturer's quality culture than any marketing page.
A quality problem doesn't have to derail your project. What matters is whether your manufacturer has the processes and the accountability to address it properly when it happens.
Still, need help? Contact Us: support@nextpcb.com
Need a PCB or PCBA quote? Quote now